|
|
Post by Kamikaze Parrot on Nov 2, 2003 7:52:45 GMT -5
Mostly when I see a movie based on a book I think the book is way better than the movie.
do you agree ?
|
|
|
|
Post by twistedangel on Nov 3, 2003 18:37:22 GMT -5
yep, well...depends on what i saw/read first. because normally when you read the book you get a mental image of how the charecter, the setting and everything looks and sounds and stuff. you know? so then when you go and see the movie...its different than what you pictured so you dont like it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kamikaze Parrot on Nov 4, 2003 5:43:55 GMT -5
yep, well...depends on what i saw/read first. because normally when you read the book you get a mental image of how the charecter, the setting and everything looks and sounds and stuff. you know? so then when you go and see the movie...its different than what you pictured so you dont like it.
I also thinks it different forms of telling a story... its hard to transform a 400 pages book to a movie.. or transfor images and different scenes to a book.
Doesnt work that well..
 |
|
|
|
Post by UnderDOG on Nov 4, 2003 8:13:00 GMT -5
Mostly when I see a movie based on a book I think the book is way better than the movie.
do you agree ? i agree. but its sometimes wrong. like lord of the rings |
|
|
|
Post by Kamikaze Parrot on Nov 4, 2003 10:11:25 GMT -5
i agree. but its sometimes wrong. like lord of the rings
did you read the book before the movie or the oposit ?
;D |
|
|
|
Post by twistedangel on Nov 4, 2003 23:11:42 GMT -5
i agree. but its sometimes wrong. like lord of the rings yep, indeed. the movie did a wonderful job with imagery and did pay attention to detail, my dads a lotr freak, and he loved the movie. and i did too. i tried reading the book...but it always confuses me  |
|
|
|
Post by Kamikaze Parrot on Nov 5, 2003 6:19:39 GMT -5
yep, indeed. the movie did a wonderful job with imagery and did pay attention to detail, my dads a lotr freak, and he loved the movie. and i did too. i tried reading the book...but it always confuses me
|
|
|
|
Post by UnderDOG on Nov 5, 2003 13:06:03 GMT -5
noo... Dan...
did you read the book before the movie or the oposit ?
;D i saw the film first. its just the books start slow |
|
|
|
Post by twistedangel on Nov 5, 2003 22:52:40 GMT -5
common angel... I read that book the first time when I was 8...
well im not good at reading, i guess. i dont know, |
|
|
|
Post by Kamikaze Parrot on Nov 6, 2003 9:07:02 GMT -5
well im not good at reading, i guess. i dont know,
 |
|
|
|
Post by twistedangel on Nov 9, 2003 4:36:41 GMT -5
I guess... you got other qualities.
yep. and my sarcasm is just so...cute. |
|
|
|
Post by spursfan on Nov 10, 2003 0:34:57 GMT -5
yep. and my sarcasm is just so...cute. yeah it is...since sarcasm seems to run in me too..lol |
|
|
|
Post by spursfan on Nov 10, 2003 0:40:19 GMT -5
Well, sometimes the books are better cause since they dont involve the writer when they do a movie, they tone it down or change it..I read Salem's Lot by Stephen king, 700+ pages, but the old movie on video, sucked...I know alot of movies that are based on comic books, Men in Black(though the comic is grittier), 30 days of night(upcoming, should be good since its based on a comic book and well about vampires going on the hunt)
|
|
|
|
Post by twistedangel on Nov 11, 2003 12:15:48 GMT -5
yeah it is...since sarcasm seems to run in me too..lol lol, actually, i was being sarcastic...but thanks! |
|
|
|
Post by spursfan on Nov 11, 2003 23:41:25 GMT -5
lol, actually, i was being sarcastic...but thanks! yeah i know, so was I ..but anywho, you are so cute. |
|
