|
|
Post by Kamikaze Parrot on Feb 25, 2004 12:44:52 GMT -5
Personally I prefere the first book
|
|
|
|
Post by Iced Tranquillity on Feb 27, 2004 14:31:52 GMT -5
Yeah I agree, I can't say the other two were all that impressive, the first of the series was nicely done, nearly flawless.
|
|
|
|
Post by THE GRIM REAPER on Feb 27, 2004 14:35:20 GMT -5
Personally I prefere the first book
here's what i wanna know are the books longer or shorter than the movies ? oh by the way you forgot to mention the hobbit the prequel |
|
|
|
Post by Kamikaze Parrot on Feb 27, 2004 15:48:02 GMT -5
here's what i wanna know are the books longer or shorter than the movies ? oh by the way you forgot to mention the hobbit the prequel
thats true.
well..
its done.
.......................
the books are longer yes.
but the movie has some side stories the book nearly skips.
Like arven, she is just mentioned in the book.
.............
its funny.
Most people. like the first book best
but with the movies its the oposit
 |
|
|
|
Post by THE GRIM REAPER on Feb 27, 2004 16:06:11 GMT -5
aww fuck.
thats true.
well..
its done.
.......................
the books are longer yes.
but the movie has some side stories the book nearly skips.
Like arven, she is just mentioned in the book.
.............
its funny.
Most people. like the first book best
but with the movies its the oposit
was jaws and jurrasic park the books better than the movies were ? |
|
|
|
Post by Kamikaze Parrot on Feb 27, 2004 16:10:23 GMT -5
was jaws and jurrasic park the books better than the movies were ?  jaws ??  |
|
|
|
Post by THE GRIM REAPER on Feb 27, 2004 16:13:31 GMT -5
lol... never read "jurrasic park" jaws ?? i loved the jurracis park trilogy but part 3 wasnt based on a book. jaws was ok i really liked that movie but that one annoying scene where the guy puts his nails on a chalk board made me dislike jaws |
|
